In my career I worked with a lot of engineers and also with a lot of hourly blue-collar technical workers. The engineers I knew made from $60,000 to $1.5 Million, with most clustered way closer to the lower end of that range. Only my boss’s boss made the $1.5 Million, and another small handful of the higher paid engineers like me eventually made it up into the multiple six figure range, though most topped out in the $100-150k range by the end of their careers. The hourly workers started for around $40,000 but within a few years could be making over $100k if they worked significant amounts of overtime. However, that was as high as they could go in that job, there are only so many hours in the day you can work if you are getting paid by the hour.
So, at any given time a lot of my younger engineers and some of the older ones actually made less than some of the hourly guys they helped to run the plant efficiently. And that was appropriate, the higher paid hourly guys had a wealth of knowledge they had gained both by experience and intensive on the job training and they earned their pay. I sometimes pondered who had the better deal, the non-degreed hourly worker, who could usually totally forget about the plant during his off hours or me, an engineer, who sometimes carried the worries and problems of the plant home with me. We’d see that dynamic play out in the hourly workers as well. We promoted from within whenever we could so it was possible for an hourly worker to move into a salaried management position, even up into a corporate officer’s position without a college degree of any kind. In fact, I watched two of my hourly friends do just that and they earned far more than $100k in their VP jobs. But to get there they had to work their way through several lower and middle management jobs that paid only slightly better, if any, than their old hourly ones and I think they suffered more stress in the management roles where there was no union protection against being fired.
It wasn’t unusual for hourly employees to turn down “promotions” to managerial jobs because there was little or no extra pay and zero overtime pay. In spite of no overtime pay there was plenty of mandatory overtime work required when there were problems. And when you work in a chemical plant that runs 24x7x365 hours per year, including every holiday, there are always problems resulting in people being called in to do extra work. Hourly workers could at least soften the pain of being called to work on their days off by the fact that they received 50% higher than normal pay but salaried workers got no extra pay for extra work on their days off. In theory there was some compensation built into the salaried workers’ pay to account for overtime but in practice almost nobody thought it was sufficient compared to the number of extra hours worked.
With the uncertainty and probable higher stress, why would any hourly worker take a salaried job? I think there are two main reasons. One, a natural desire to achieve as much as you can. Leading a team brings a different kind of growth and experience versus being one of the ones being led. And secondly, moving into a salaried management position can be a first step in a longer path of promotions and increased compensation. My two friends who ultimately became corporate officers were eventually compensated with stock bonuses and large annual bonuses that brought their total compensation to a level much higher than their previous hourly jobs. It is a common debate at most plants in the chemical and refining world as to whether staying as a highly paid hourly worker isn’t preferable to moving into a salaried position with more potential future growth. It is a tough decision to make because usually there is no second chance to choose again. Just last year I met an hourly union worker at a plant in Texas that made $185,000 that year and had not made less than $140,000 in each of the previous two years. That’s a lot of money! But I also have met people who promoted from hourly jobs to salaried ones and ended up multimillionaires due to their rising to the top of their companies.
I knew two guys who wrestled with this very decision, decided differently, and had very different outcomes. Donnie was a process operator. His job was to control a complex set of equipment through a computer control system to make the most amount of product possible, safely and with the least input of energy and raw materials. He had only completed a high school degree but he was very intelligent, had studied with diligence on the job and was a talented operator. He worked overtime when it was available and made right at one hundred thousand dollars a year, in today’s dollars. Bob, Big Bob we called him, because he was six foot five inches tall and well over 300 lbs, was likewise a high school graduate and a very intelligent operator. Donnie and Bob had one other thing in common that was unique to the two of them. Both of them had finished over three years of college in engineering but for their own reasons had dropped out prior to graduation. And both had wondered for years if it made sense to go back to school and finish up their degrees.
As it turned out one of them, Donnie, decided to do that. He returned to college and a year later he obtained his chemical engineering degree and went to work for another chemical company. But Bob considered the cost, and although he was only one semester away from completing his electrical engineering degree, he decided to stay in his hourly position. Both paths were open to both men and one took chose to return to college and the other stayed in his hourly job. So, how do you think their careers worked out?
These are real people, people I worked with for many years and I can vouch for this story. The results were somewhat surprising to me. Donnie, when he earned his chemical engineering degree, applied for work at our company. At that time, we did not have an opening and, frankly, his technical skills did not impress us when we interviewed him. There were a lot of jobs available and he easily found a position somewhere else. We kept in touch for years and I followed his career until we saw the sad news that he had died unexpectedly. I never tried to ascertain his actual compensation but I hired enough engineers to know what the kinds of positions he held paid, and I’d say he ended up making in the low one hundred thousand range. Good money but not much higher than he would have made staying in the hourly operator position and probably less than had he promoted up into management.
Big Bob kept his hourly job and in time he did promote to a first line salaried supervisor position. And he was a very good manager. Over time he was given more responsibility, more promotions, and he and I basically rose up in the ranks together. When they eventually split our company into a manufacturing division and a transportation one. I ran the plant and he ran everything else. His pay was in the multiple six figure range even though he never finished his college degree.
So why did his career go so much further than Donnie’s? The short answer is that Bob was a better leader and manager and offered more value. Donnie had the technical degree but his soft skills were not as good as Bob’s. That isn’t a severe criticism of Donnie, Bob was truly exceptional. Also, Donnie started over at the midpoint of his career and that left him less time to move up. In addition, I would guess that engineering students that leave college during their final year do so because they have realized they are not a great fit with engineering. Either the technical demands of their courses exceed their ability or it just does not interest them. In either case it does not bode well for a top tier engineering career.
If you stay as a technical person and are judged to have median technical skills, which is where Donnie was, your engineering pay will cap just like an hourly operator’s pay. Your market value will just stop growing and so will your paycheck. But, if you keep rising in responsibility like Bob, which in most cases means management, the sky is the limit. Bob and I had hundreds of people we were responsible for so our pay was a small thing to our CEO. If we could get better performance out of our teams then the CEO was happy to pay us for that. In a way moving up the management ladder is a way of decoupling your pay from the number of hours you work because you are leveraging the efforts of your entire team. If you can get the team to perform 1% better and your team is hundreds of employees then that’s a lot of return to your shareholders and is likely to come back to you as far more than a 1% raise. I know it did for both Bob and me.
What’s the point of this true parable from my past? There are several, I think. First, make career decisions carefully. Both Donnie and Bob were proficient at what they were doing as hourly operators but maybe not cut out to excel at engineering. Going into any job that you’ll never be better than average at is a bad choice in my opinion. If engineering doesn’t light you up and get you excited, then don’t try to be an engineer. I have to think that if engineering had excited them, they would not have dropped out of college prior to graduating, in the first place. However, working in the plant did light up Bob, and he was a joy to work with for all those around him. And that made him a great leader, which propelled him to a great career. A career that far outshined what he could have accomplished as an “average” electrical engineer.
With Donnie the situation might be more complex. I do not think his plant job satisfied him but he also would not have been a great management candidate, because he did not demonstrate Bob’s leadership ability. Maybe he really did enjoy his engineering career, even if it went along an average-ish path. Or perhaps there was a third choice he should have gone toward. It is impossible to know since his path was cut tragically short.
I’m not trying to impart great wisdom here, only to say that in Bob’s case the lack of a college degree cost him nothing, in my opinion. He had a great career both in terms of compensation and job satisfaction. In Donnie’s case I think going back and completing his degree was an accomplishment he was proud of but I’m not sure he enjoyed his career any more than he did being an hourly operator. The lesson I’m sure of though, is that both of them made a conscious decision about finishing up their education. And maybe the lesson is simply, do not just drift. If there is a decision you know you should make, then think it through and make it. Even if the decision ends up being to just stay where you are and grow where you are already planted.
What about you, have you had friends who left their secure jobs to do something difficult or risky?
Or do you know people, maybe you, who contemplated making a drastic detour to finish college or start up a new venture but decided it wasn’t what you wanted to do.
Did it work out awesomely like Bob’s choice not to finish college?
Or did it work out more, meh, like Donnie’s where there is satisfaction with finishing but maybe still failing to find that dream job they were looking for?
As Usual if you don’t see the comment box just click on the title at the beginning of the post!